Following (1999)

Director Christopher Nolan with Jeremy Theobald

Short, shoe-string, B&W and twisty. Typical Nolan non-linear narrative (you had to check the haircut) and very well-crafted. A young man spirals into gangland nastiness while looking for material for his book. I could be sniffy about plot holes, but while I was watching I was gripped and didn’t care. It unlocked a sense of nostalgia too: remembering when CDs were the norm – never mind worth stealing – and credit cards had to be ironed under carbon paper slips and signed.

The Return

Director Uberto Pasolini with Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche

Odysseus’s return to Ithaca after 20 years away, a broken man washed up on a mismanaged island. Fiennes and Binoche were brilliant, making scenes their own. Other parts though were underwritten and would have been more at home in a film with special effects by Ray Harryhausen. It was strong on the long-lasting horrors of war – for Odysseus, who lost all the men under his command, and for Penelope, abandoned and fearful of the atrocities that her husband might have been involved in. Of course, a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do and so there was a shoot-out – just like any western or gangster film. Except that Homer got there first, and we’ve been reading and watching that story ever since.

Postscript: I suddenly remembered life after the warrior’s return in One Fine Day. I can’t imagine Odysseus pitching into the washing-up, and he certainly wouldn’t have had a “servant problem”!

Hundreds of Beavers

Director Mike Cheslik with Ryland Tews

I was feeling under the weather so this was perfect viewing. Wonderfully silly and inventive. I don’t imagine I caught all the influences: it had the look of an early silent movie mixed with Bugs Bunny, Charlie Chaplin, slapstick, James Bond . . . and even Monty Python’s fish-slapping dance. Shades too of Wallace and Gromit. There was a kind of a plot involving fur-trapping and beavers building a space rocket. Unforgettable scenes included huskies playing poker by a hurricane lamp each evening – the sole survivor reduced to playing solitaire as the big bad wolves picked off the team one by one each night.

Paterson (2016)

Director Jim Jarmusch with Adam Driver and Golshifteh Farahani

One of those films where practically nothing happens. (The one potentially dramatic incident is over in seconds and was not as life-threatening as it seemed at first.) It’s a week in the life of a bus driver called Paterson living in the town of Paterson – one of many mirrorings/twinnings in the film. He drives the same route every day, overhears conversations, writes poetry in a notebook and admires William Carlos Williams – who also wrote an epic poem, “Paterson”, about the city.

The film is a kind of poetic depiction of ordinary life as experienced by kindly, gentle people. They have their pleasures, their interests and their dreams which may never be fulfilled but are nonetheless fulfilling. The camera moves slowly and I had to rein in any impatience. Paterson’s (unimpressive) poems are an essential part of him – just as painting everything black and white is important to his wife. Theirs is a very loving, gentle relationship; her ambitions are a bit flaky (cup cake queen or country and western singer? . . . decisions, decisions), but she is not unsuccessful. The dog (who deserves his own Oscar) destroys Paterson’s notebook of poems, and for a while there is a sense of loss – until a chance encounter sets him back on his path.

In many ways it’s a film that transcends the quotidian life it depicts – like Perfect Days or Nomadland. Unlike some films – I’m thinking of Jeanne Dielman – there seemed to be no underlying ideology/political message. It wasn’t a Ken Loach film about a bus driver. It was about ordinary people and their relationships with other ordinary people and the world around them.

Sister Midnight

Director Karan Kandhari with Radhika Apte

Rather like The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser, this was a film about someone pitchforked into a totally alien environment – here, an arranged marriage and life in Mumbai. The similarity ended there. This was visually bold, energetic, macabre; it had memorable images, a wonderful soundtrack, an actress who dominated the screen. . . but, withal, I thought it was disjointed, even though it began and ended with train journeys. Superficial, lacking coherence and running out of steam long before the end.

The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser (1974)

Director Werner Herzog with Bruno S

The German title is Jeder für sich und Gott gegen alle, which sets up different expectations. It’s a better title, since this film is to the mystery of the real Kaspar Hauser as the fable of the town mouse and the country mouse is to murine studies. I was in two minds about bothering to watch it, but from the first I was hooked. A scratchy gramophone recording of Dies Bildnis ist bezaubernd schön, Pachelbel’s Canon, fields of swaying cereal, mountains, lakes and quiet German squares: it appealed to all my feelings about Germany. It was indeed bezaubernd schön.

Kaspar has been kept chained in a cellar all his life – barely speaking, unable to walk, existing on bread and water. It should be a horror story – and in real life it would be, of course, but that is not Herzog’s interest. Kaspar is not unhappy with his lot; he has what he needs and is troubled by nothing. One night his captor takes him outside and abandons him in a town square, leaving him to the mercies of the townsfolk. Thus innocent, ignorant Kaspar is reborn – this time into a society with its chains of ideas and conventions. Reactions to him range from kind to curious; there is no hostility, no beatings – just a painfully slow introduction to language and ordinary human life. The worst things that happens to him are that he is exhibited in a circus to pay for his keep and briefly becomes the protégé of an English aristocrat. Outwardly he adapts and learns, but he is never comfortable. As in Evil Does Not Exist, it’s the human world, not the human himself, which is the wrong fit. We see the bizarre world of human-determined categories through Kaspar’s eyes: I was ready to applaud when he bested a pompous professor of logic! Philip Larkin’s Days came to my mind:

. . . the priest and the doctor / In their long coats / Running over the fields

to see how this “noble savage” could confirm their own pet theories.

Goodness knows what Bruno S had suffered in his own life, but he was perfect in the role of Kaspar – even though he was far too old for the part and not an actor. His oddness and directness and his stilted language were just right: never at ease in this new world, where he was troubled by dreams that he never had in his cellar. Liberation brought him anxiety rather than freedom. Perhaps das Bildnis was not so schön and die Empfindung was not Liebe after all.

All We Imagine As Light

Director Payal Kapadia with Kani Kusruti and Divya Prabha

My main – indeed, by the end, my only – thought about this film was that it was unnecessarily slow. My residual impatience has pushed the film to one side for a few days, but I need to pull it out again to put it on my blog pile.

There was a lot in it. During the opening credits, with all its French and Dutch companies, I wondered if it were indeed an Indian film. But it is – and is both familiar and strange. For example, I had no idea what languages people were speaking and what that implied about the background/status/interactions, etc, and I realise now how that adds to the film’s strength in positioning its characters in a particular society, place and time. It’s set in Mumbai and opens with nighttime shots of city streets against voiceovers (by real people?) talking about the precariousness and transience of life there, even after decades of living there – something that was picked up later. It wears its feminism lightly and subtly: the women form a classic trio, all defined externally by “husband”. The unmarried nurse is being pressured to marry by her parents (while illicitly in love with a Muslim man). The husband of the married nurse has lived and worked in Germany since shortly after their arranged marriage and she hasn’t heard from him in over a year; she is therefore in marital limbo and must forego romantic love. The widowed cook is being forced out of her home because her late husband left no paperwork confirming her right to live there, and must return to her village. There is, briefly at the beginning, a fourth woman, an elderly widow, also suffering from “husband”: she is confused and imagines – to her horror – that the torso of her husband is in her kitchen. Once again, it sets a precedent, for I thought of her again as the married nurse looked at the rice cooker made in Germany, lowering at her from a corner under the kitchen worktop, as if it were the familiar of her vanished husband.

Visually it lives up to its title. The Mumbai scenes are often at night, after work when it is slightly cooler. Dark, hemmed-in, busy. In the widow’s village we are blinded by the light and space – a breathing space, a sense of hope and light-heartedness. Here – as if in a fairy tale – changes are made to all three women’s lives. The final scene is on the nighttime beach in a shack bar brilliantly illuminated, balancing points of light against the background darkness.

Having thought about it sufficiently to be able to write about it, I see how good and thoughtful a film it was. But, yeah, a bit slow.