Wajda’s War Trilogy

I’d only meant to watch Kanal, but the BFI app had all three of Wajda’s war films so we watched them all. They do not follow on from each other, except to chronicle key moments in wartime Poland: in fact I was a little disconcerted at first to see an actor whose character had died in A Generation playing another part in Kanal. There were blanks in my knowledge that I think I’ve managed to fill a bit – and really, how could it not occur to me that of course there would have been anti-communist resistance to Soviet dominance of Poland once it was liberated from the Nazis? I know all about the Greek civil war, so why not Poland? (Except that the Soviets were already in situ and brutally triumphant, so the outcome was never in doubt.)

More ignorance about the layers of national history and ideology that I just had to guess at. These films were made in the mid/late 1950s so post-date the posthumous reassessment of Stalin and straddle the Polish thaw. They were financed – and hence sanctioned – by the state and were expected to have a pro-socialist message. Like British WWII films, they presented a contemporary view of recent historical events – answering, perhaps, a need for remembrance or catharsis or – for Poland – an alternative to the dominant ideology. Grim, tragic and practically devoid of levity and the semaphored sentimentality you find in British films.

Wajda was born in 1926 and joined the Polish Home Army as a teenager, and his actors would have had similar wartime experiences. That adds a chilling aura to these films. They know what they are talking about, and I just had to listen.

A Generation (1955)

A shanty town on the outskirts of Warsaw mid-war and a young man who swaps petty crime for an apprenticeship in a furniture workshop. He is inspired by a communist co-worker and joins the resistance movement, assisting in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. The final shot is of him and his handful of comrades – a little, doomed battalion – heading off for further resistance.

Shades of Italian neo-realism in its “natural” shots. According to Wikipedia, the machine guns shot live ammunition as there was at that time no way of shooting blanks – ! I gradually became more and more involved in it and was quite bereft at the end.

More ignorance on my part: I had no idea there was a Warsaw Ghetto Uprising as well as the Warsaw Uprising.

Kanal (1957)

The fag end of the Warsaw Uprising. The only possibility is defeat, and the only unknown is when. A group of resistance fighters are ordered to retreat via the city sewers and come to an end in various ways. It’s claustrophobic and gripping – and also raises questions of sacrifice and heroism. It reminds you of the scale of the suffering – both military and civilian.

Ashes and Diamonds (1958)

A more elaborately shot, symbolic film which initially took some working out. It’s a turning point in Poland’s history: 8 May 1945 and the Nazis have surrendered to the Soviets. There is a celebratory banquet in a town’s big hotel. A Polish administrator who has spent the war in the USSR comes to the town to take up a new post under Soviet direction. There are some anti-communist Home Army soldiers and organisers fighting against Soviet rule. Two of them – one, Maciek, looking like James Dean and one William Hartnell in Brighton Rock – are ordered to shoot the administrator but kill the wrong men.

It’s a conflicted film. There are two opposed sides and there are parallel scenes as they remember those they fought beside, but – in 1958 – the anti-communist resistance just had to be the bad guys. In his doomed persona though Maciek knits the two together. He has a tender interlude with a barmaid, and their conversation brings home how the war crushed their young lives. Maciek has a few fellow soldiers left to him (although many have died) but his eyesight is damaged by his time in the dark sewers; she has lost everyone in her life and is totally uprooted.

Towards the end, as Maciek flees for his life, the anti-communist gentry, drunk after the banquet, perform a shaky dance while the band discordantly plays a polonaise. I suppose for the authorities that ridicule might have cancelled out the sympathy that the audience must have felt for the disillusioned – but criminal – Maciek.

La Règle du Jeu (1939)

Director Jean Renoir

One of those films that I was always on the outside of – an interested but detached viewer, wondering if my reading of the film was the one that the writer and director intended.

Well, perhaps. I thought it a comic opera plot filmed in prose: “The Marriage of Figaro” meets Brian Rix. Upstairs-downstairs, a country house weekend, an extended hunting scene (WWI with a nod to fears of WWII perhaps?), a milieu where affaires and kissing the housemaid on the stairs are de rigueur – all filmed at breakneck speed. Afterwards I read about the technical innovations: lenses with a deep depth of field for the corridor scenes, extended takes. (Poor innovators: after a few decades, audiences no longer see how groundbreaking they were.) I wasn’t convinced that the film successfully skewered the “rules of the game” cynicism of the upper classes – if that was indeed its aim. What was it about the Marquis collecting clockwork toys – was that a symbol? As I said, it left me unmoved – except for mild amusement at the woodenness of the actress who played Christine.

Persona (1966)

Director Ingmar Bergman with Bibi Andersson and Liv Ullman

Hmmm. At the point where the camera shifts from Elisabet to Alma so that the audience has to listen to the latter’s purported account of the birth of Elisabet’s son for a second time, I lost all interest and patience. There are so many – possible – themes: identity, truth, secrets, sex, atrocities, love and rejection, a hint of vampirism (?) . . . that I could get no handle on it and was bored. Give me one or two themes in a film, but don’t overwhelm me with them otherwise I will look away and turn to words as a more appropriate form of expression. It looks wonderful – how could it not, with two beautiful, stylish women who resemble each other and are filmed so cleverly? The occasional breaking-up of the physical film comes over like the expression of a scream – and reminds you that it’s only a film. But, oh, it was so obscure and self-referential that I wanted to scream myself before the end.

Up there with Last Year in Marienbad as a film that was a chore to sit through to the end.

The Piano (1992)

Director Jane Campion with Holly Hunter, Harvey Keitel, Sam Neill

A sensual, shocking film filled with intriguing painterly images from the start: pink sunshine coming through fingers. The sensuousness of a hole in a stocking (“A sweet disorder in the dress. . .”). Who cares if it’s feasible to spend a night on a windswept beach in the shelter of a crinoline cage – it was true within the framing of this film. The most mind-blowing and heart-breaking image was of Ada’s crinoline sinking into the mud as she collapsed after her husband’s revenge. Shades even of the death of the Wicked Witch of the West. Perhaps not the allusion the director intended, although, on reflection, there is something traditionally witch-like about Ada’s blacks and unyielding expression.

It’s about an electively mute woman, her daughter and her piano, through which she communicates and speaks to he who has ears to hear. So much is unspoken in the film: why did she stop speaking at the age her daughter is now? The little girl is a tremendous talker – but so much of what she says are made-up stories. Perhaps muteness is a way to be true and utter no lies. Love and desire in this film certainly grow without the need for words – and there are dreadful consequences in putting feelings into words that can be read by the wrong eyes.

It’s one of those films that make you think about the inequitable agency/choice (as far as it was possible for anyone) for women of previous eras. Ada’s prickly will is her armour, as her music is her amour. She allows her will to be drowned but her music in future will always have a metallic ring. Perhaps that counts as a happy ending.

La Strada (1954)

Director Federico Fellini with Giulietta Masina, Anthony Quinn, Richard Basehart

I was introduced to this by the first session on Italian neo-realism and won over by Masina’s face and expressiveness. Simple-minded girl is sold to a travelling strongman by her poor mother (some money + one less mouth to feed = what else can you do?). You’re in deepest material poverty from the very beginning. Zampano is a brute: Gelsomina’s sister had been sold to him previously and had died. For a brief moment at the start it seemed as if Gelsomina’s quirkiness might survive, but it is beaten out of her.

It’s a road movie (the clue’s in the title): from the opening shots of Gelsomina’s home by the sea to a life on the road, a brief escape (where she first meets the tightrope-walking Fool) then recapture and an interlude with the circus. A night in a convent, where she rejects the chance to stay, and then life just gets worse. Although it’s “realistic” in terms of its setting (you feel the cold, the hunger, the fear), in structure it’s more of a fable. Life hovers between the convent and the circus, the sacred and the profane. Zampano is a strongman – heavy, earthbound, daily breaking the chain about his chest and daily fastening it up again. The Fool is as light as air – a sprite, a spirit who tells Gelsomina that everyone has a purpose in life, however small. Thus she is persuaded that her purpose is to stay with Zampano rather than escape from him. Inner conviction trumps survival.

It ends by the sea once again – which makes me think of “Dover Beach”, and “fishers of men”, and connotations of the unknown and the feminine, and the final scene of “La Dolce Vita”. And then I wonder what I am missing, not having been brought a Roman Catholic in mid-century Italy with ubiquitous images of Christ on the cross and saints being martyred in grisly ways. And all those tropes by male authors of a woman suffering meekly, usually at the hands of men: it was there in “Tokyo Story”, “The Red Shoes”, Mouchette, Nancy and many other of Charles Dickens’s women, Fantine, “Breaking the Waves”, Isabel Archer, etc etc. What is that all about?

Our views on the film were divided. I increasingly thought it was brilliant. Others found it simply depressing – also a very valid point of view.

Sergio Strizzi: The Perfect Moment

An exhibition at the Estorick Collection of film stills and other photographs by Strizzi (1931-2004). He captured, amongst others, Monica Vitti and Marcello Mastroianni in their Antontonioni/Fellini days. And how beautiful Alain Delon was!

Various things came to mind as I browsed. How Italy personified modernity, beauty and style in the 1960s (Vitti looking sultry at the top of the Torre Galfa in Milan). The “male gaze” thing we’d been talking about in the film session. (Spaghetti straps for her, smart suit for him.) An astonishing photograph from 1954 of Sophia Loren signing autographs for fans (nearly all of them male) that made me think of the scene in “L’Avventura” when the American actress is besieged by men or Anita Ekberg in “La Dolce Vita”. Those scenes have always seemed akin to human sacrifice to me, but perhaps they weren’t overdone at all.

And now I want to watch all these films again!

The alternative gaze

This time the session was on cinema that challenged the dominant narrative, so we blanked the male gaze and looked at feminist films.

Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles, Chantal Ackerman, 1975

A film I’ve seen and already thought much about. This time the thing that struck me while viewing a short section was the flashing light outside – as if an alternative life was signalling to Jeanne Dielman that she didn’t have to live the way she did.

Potiche, François Ozon, 2010

I saw this when it came out. It enjoys the clichés of the 1970s when it is set (velour tracksuits and Farrah Fawcett hair) and takes a predictable scalpel to the sexual politics of the time (a bit like “9 to 5”). You’d have to be pretty Victorian (of whatever century) to find this approach challenging, but it was entertaining.